Sony FX3 vs ALEXA Mini Footage Comparison - vancelawas1993
Sony FX3 vs ALEXA Mini Footage Comparison
As much American Samoa we fire place and say that most filmmaking is not virtually the gear, we have to also admit that a tiny bit of IT is definitely about the appurtenance. There is a cause that equipment like the ARRI ALEXA are selected for high-destruction productions. That ISN't to say that affordable gear can't produce images that are on par with equipment multiple multiplication its cost – it perfectly can.
It is even nice to see some of these options put maneuver to head. Nowadays we have one such comparing from filmmaker Blaine Westropp. He took an ARRI ALEXA Mini LF and did tests against a Sony FX3. There's a price difference of tens of thousands of dollars between them.
Both cameras are arrange to ISO 640, 5600K, and with no tint. The lens was a DZOFilm Vespid wasp 35mm T2.1 used wide open with an ARRI .3 ND and a 1/125 second shutter speed. Also the same between the two cameras is a UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) resolution. Where they differ is in the codec and Gamma. ARRI uses ProRes 4444 in Log-C while the FX3 is national XAVC S-I with S-Log3.
This was all with the lighting of the view, which features large windows in the background in effect backlighting the subject. This is a tough scene to handle well once graded, and Westropp aimed to start trimming the highlights slimly to see how they are handled. In Rec.709 there was slight trimming merely in log the information was retained.
Anyway, it does appear once again that a sub-$4,000 camera is competing with one and only that breaks the $20,000 scratch.
Images by ARRI
The FX3 delivers in terms of pure envision tone. Enough of dynamic range and decent colouring material handling throughout the whole aspect – both ungraded and graded.
The ARRI ALEXA has whatsoever insidious differences and appears to sustain a slightly many neutral color, but that's a big jump in price for a minor gain. Don't get me wrong, these differences matter, just not to your everyday shooter.
What is rum is that Blaine points forbidden that it is difficult to equate the two cameras. So, while the FX3 is an amazing camera, it might not be the best if you are aiming to add together a B television camera to your ARRI kit.
What are your thoughts after observation the footage?
[source: Blaine Westropp]
Order Golf links:
- Sony a7S Trey Mirrorless Camera (B&A;H, Amazon)
- Sony FX3 Cinema Tv camera (B&H, Virago)
- ARRI ALEXA Mini LF (B&H)
Source: https://www.4kshooters.net/2021/10/04/sony-fx3-vs-alexa-mini-footage-comparison/
Posted by: vancelawas1993.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Sony FX3 vs ALEXA Mini Footage Comparison - vancelawas1993"
Post a Comment